Sitemap Contact
   
 
 
How DFA Can Help the Property/Casualty Industry, Part 4
Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma...
Catastrophes: Models and Reserving
Limitations to Any Model
Models After the Loss
Katrina at T + 5
Standards of Practice: ASOP 38
Risk Measures
Hurricanes: 2003 and 2004 Results, Clustering and TransitioninG
Hurricanes: 2003 and 2004 Results, Clustering and TransitioninG
Brushfire and Fire Following Exposures
Tsunami Exposure Worldwide and U.S.
Wind and Hail: Relative Hazard Levels
Cat Modeling Class
Introduction to Reinsurance
Holborn Technical Seminar
Catastrophe, Injury, and Insurance
Review of Myers & Read ARIA Paper
A Perfectly Ordinary Tuesday Morning
This is Not Your Father’s Cat Model
Global Warming and Increased Catastrophes?
Reinsurer Risk Loads from Marginal Surplus Requirements, PCAS LXXVII
Reinsurance Markets
Risk Transfer Assessment
Introduction to Asset Returns and Risks
CAS Call Paper Panel
Ceded Reinsurance Issues in DFA
Catastrophe Reinsurance Simulation Game
Reinsurance by any other name
Clash Pricing
ALLOCATION OF SURPLUS FOR A MULTI-LINE INSURER
Optimization to Improve Business Performance

 

 
September 14, 2005
by Paul J. Kneuer
   

Katrina at T + 5

The latest wind-only loss estimates (as of Friday PM, September 2) are:

  • EQE $9Bn – $17Bn

  • AIR $12Bn – $26Bn

  • RMS $20Bn – $35Bn

These are all on the low side, because of non-modeled exposures. They likely exclude LAE, insured Flood losses, most marine losses (except RMS is including rigs), at least EQE is only speaking about the second landfall. There are no estimates yet from PCS or Sigma, and they will be informative.

But even with this detail, the degree of damage will be fairly difficult to gauge. Here are some considerations:

  • The models do not measure flood except at the coastline. Homes are insured by the Federal plan, not the market, but there is Flood coverage for Personal and Commercial auto, Contractors and Farm equipment, PAF’s, Cargo, MOP and many commercial property policies (although usually sublimited.)

  • Further inland, tree limb damage is not modeled outside of the areas with sustained winds over 50 or so mph. There will be losses inland that are not modeled.

  • The tornados in Georgia can be modeled, but they could not be in these estimates at this date.

  • The marine loss will be substantial. RMS notes that this is likely the largest rig storm loss ever, and Ivan was a sizeable loss. There is also a great deal of damage to docks, marinas and yachts.

  • There has been some notable fires and looting.

  • Mold.

  • Existing and compounding damage from Ivan and Dennis in the Mobile to Pennsacola areas.

  • Time element coverage will be extended because of the continuing evacuation orders and because of the need to clean up from flooding before residents can safely return.

We should also expect a higher than expected degree of demand surge, both because of the remaining inflations from the 2004 situation, and because of significant resources devoted to Fed Flood and other uninsured losses.

Katrina vs. Ivan
Population Density

Holborn Observations

On-shore Wind Loss Based on windspeed, pressure, local population, initial news reports and preliminary client “footprint” analyses, we estimate damage as similar to Andrew’s $22Bn in 2005 dollars.
Off-shore Loss Worst ever, > Ivan’s $2.6 Bn
Insured Flood BAD!
Total Market Loss Worst ever natural Cat in nominal dollars
Total Economic Loss As bad as 9/11 in dollars, less than SF 1906 or Kobe as a percent of GDP