Sitemap Contact
   
 
 
How DFA Can Help the Property/Casualty Industry, Part 4
Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma...
Catastrophes: Models and Reserving
Risk Measures
Reinsurer Results:
Catastrophe and Strengthening
Hurricanes: 2003 and 2004 Results, Clustering and TransitioninG
2003 Hurricanes: Isabel
2004 Hurricanes:
Charley, Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne
Evaluating Model Performance
Claims Data Initiative
Demand Surge and Non-Modeled Losses
Clustering and Seasonal Deductibles
A Look Ahead
Brushfire and Fire Following Exposures
Tsunami Exposure Worldwide and U.S.
Wind and Hail: Relative Hazard Levels
Cat Modeling Class
Introduction to Reinsurance
Holborn Technical Seminar
Catastrophe, Injury, and Insurance
Review of Myers & Read ARIA Paper
A Perfectly Ordinary Tuesday Morning
This is Not Your Father’s Cat Model
Global Warming and Increased Catastrophes?
Reinsurer Risk Loads from Marginal Surplus Requirements, PCAS LXXVII
Reinsurance Markets
Risk Transfer Assessment
Introduction to Asset Returns and Risks
CAS Call Paper Panel
Ceded Reinsurance Issues in DFA
Catastrophe Reinsurance Simulation Game
Reinsurance by any other name
Clash Pricing
ALLOCATION OF SURPLUS FOR A MULTI-LINE INSURER
Optimization to Improve Business Performance
 
May 12-13, 2005
Laurie A. Johnson
2005 Client Technical Seminar

Hurricane Isabel (Cat 2)

Hurricane Isabel: Summary Statistics

Weak category 2 hurricane at landfall on Outer Banks, NC, with
maximum sustained winds of 100 mph (160 kph); lower windspeeds
across large area

Storm surge: 5 to 6 feet (1.5 to 1.8 m) along NC a nd VA coast;
2 to 4 ft (0.6 to 1.2m) in Maryland, Delaware and New Jersey

Thousands of trees blown down; 3.5 million initially without pow

Building damage: 1,200 homes destroyed in VA; >500,000 claims

Economic losses: $3.4 billion

Insured losses ~ 2.1 billion (PCS)

  • $1.69 billion (PCS), across 7 states

  • $405 million (NFIP) - 24,000

Human losses: 50 deaths (16 direct and 34 indirect)

Hurricane Isabel: Wind and Surge Damage

Hurricane Isabel: Lessons and Outcomes

RMS modeled windfield matched well with wind-related losses

IIsabel’s winds at the low end of vulnerability damage curves, with considerably higher uncertainty

Many claims outside the windfield footprint

“The damage that resulted was not of a type that might have been expected for the average winds that occurred... there was a large amount of structural damage resulting from fallen trees striking structures.”

- (Dr. Mike Gaus , AAWE President , Nov. 2003)

Key 2004 Tropical Storms

Perspectives on the Industry Losses in 2004

U.S. Onshore

Event RMS post-event footprint* RMS Industry Total* PCS Industry Total***
Charley $7.4 bn $6-8 bn $7.5 bn
Frances $3.2 bn $3-6 bn $4.6 bn
Ivan $3.1 bn
(wind/surge)
$3-6 bn $7.1 bn
Jeanne $3.9 bn $4-8 bn $3.7 bn
Total $17.6 bn $16-28 bn $22.9 bn

U.S. Offshore

Event RMS CB Industry Total RMS OP Industry Total
France $500 mn -o-
Ivan $1.7 bn >$1 bn
Jeanne $500 mn -o-
* Mean loss using RMS’ 2004 industry exposure
**Includes demand surge, modeled & non-modeled sources
*** Based on PCS’ 01/20/05 and earlier estimates