Sitemap Contact
   
 
 
How DFA Can Help the Property/Casualty Industry, Part 4
Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma...
Catastrophes: Models and Reserving
Risk Measures
Reinsurer Results:
Catastrophe and Strengthening
Hurricanes: 2003 and 2004 Results, Clustering and TransitioninG
2003 Hurricanes: Isabel
2004 Hurricanes:
Charley, Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne
Evaluating Model Performance
Claims Data Initiative
Demand Surge and Non-Modeled Losses
Clustering and Seasonal Deductibles
A Look Ahead
Brushfire and Fire Following Exposures
Tsunami Exposure Worldwide and U.S.
Wind and Hail: Relative Hazard Levels
Cat Modeling Class
Introduction to Reinsurance
Holborn Technical Seminar
Catastrophe, Injury, and Insurance
Review of Myers & Read ARIA Paper
A Perfectly Ordinary Tuesday Morning
This is Not Your Father’s Cat Model
Global Warming and Increased Catastrophes?
Reinsurer Risk Loads from Marginal Surplus Requirements, PCAS LXXVII
Reinsurance Markets
Risk Transfer Assessment
Introduction to Asset Returns and Risks
CAS Call Paper Panel
Ceded Reinsurance Issues in DFA
Catastrophe Reinsurance Simulation Game
Reinsurance by any other name
Clash Pricing
ALLOCATION OF SURPLUS FOR A MULTI-LINE INSURER
Optimization to Improve Business Performance

 

 
May 12-13, 2005
Laurie A. Johnson
2005 Client Technical Seminar

Evaluating Model Performance

2004 Hurricanes: Characteristics Consistent With Stochastic Model Parameters

RMS Stochastic Event Set

RMS hurricane stochastic event set contains several similar events to the actual hurricane tracks and characteristics

Charley – Cat 4

Frances Frances – Cat 2

Ivan – Cat 3

Jeanne – Cat 3

Correlation of Risk Between Regions

RMS stochastic tracks represent the actual and potential correlation of risk between different regions (Clash)

  • Stochastic track selections below show Ivan’s path across Jamaica and Grand Cayman, and Charley's potential impact on western Florida

RMS Industry Survey of Modeled and Incurred Losses

Portfolio-level loss experiences have been gathered for approximately 70% of the total industry loss (roughly even percentages between personal and commercial lines)

Books of Business
Event-specific Losses
Total
107
Total
366
Personal Lines 43
Personal Lines
154
Commercial Lines 53
Commercial Lines
178

Summary by Event: All Lines of Business

Frances and Jeanne Claims

Summary by Event: Personal vs. Commercial Lines

Personal Lines Losses for the 2004 Season

Overall, personal lines consistent with modeled losses

  • Personal lines losses account for 2/3 of the industry loss

However large variability around the mean

  • Manufactured Housing

  • Multi Multi-family vs. single family

  • Year and type of construction

  • Impact of building codes, practices and construction quality

Commercial Lines Variability

Significant variability in individual company losses

  • 90% of modeled vs actual loss ratios between 0.14 and 1.42

Disproportionately high amount of loss results from a small number of accounts in many commercial books

Commercial example of modeled / incurred losses

  • Ratio for excess book: 0.5

  • Removing just one account improves ratio by: 33%

Diagnosing model performance at portfolio level requires detailed analysis of individual accounts

Business Owners
Policies (BOP)
Standard COM Fortune 2000 Excess Surplus …

Possible Drivers of Variability in Commercial Lines

Exposure data, and the modeling of it, is more complex

Commercial lines more likely to incur non-modeled losses

Slower settling of claims

Demand surge generally greater for commercial classes

Reserves are traditionally set high

Excess layers are more sensitive to uncertainties in the windfield