Sitemap Contact
   
 
 
How DFA Can Help the Property/Casualty Industry, Part 4
Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma...
Catastrophes: Models and Reserving
Risk Measures
Reinsurer Results:
Catastrophe and Strengthening
Hurricanes: 2003 and 2004 Results, Clustering and TransitioninG
Brushfire and Fire Following Exposures
Tsunami Exposure Worldwide and U.S.
Wind and Hail: Relative Hazard Levels
Cat Modeling Class
Introduction to Reinsurance
Holborn Technical Seminar
Catastrophe, Injury, and Insurance
Review of Myers & Read ARIA Paper
A Perfectly Ordinary Tuesday Morning
This is Not Your Father’s Cat Model
Global Warming and Increased Catastrophes?
Reinsurer Risk Loads from Marginal Surplus Requirements, PCAS LXXVII
Reinsurance Markets
Risk Transfer Assessment
Introduction to Asset Returns and Risks
CAS Call Paper Panel
Ceded Reinsurance Issues in DFA
Catastrophe Reinsurance Simulation Game
Reinsurance by any other name
Clash Pricing
ALLOCATION OF SURPLUS FOR A MULTI-LINE INSURER
Optimization to Improve Business Performance

 

 
June 3, 1997
Paul J. Kneuer
 
Page: 1 2

Comparison of Pure Premiums (Covered Losses, Less AP)

Comparison of Standard Deviations of Results

Layer Price with One Reinstatement at100%

Comparison of Loaded Premiums

The Conflict

The conventional view of premiums as probabilities significantly understates the value of coverage with reinstatements at 100% as measured by our best current tools.

A one-at- 100% cover can actually be worth more than a cover without reinstatement !!

Actuaries need new practical approaches to risk that are consistent with our overall pricing philosophies.

Some Steps in the Right Direction

These two papers apply new tools to the problems of measuring and treating the marginal cost of risk:

  • Game Theory - to allocate total risk charge to contracts

  • Modern Computational Power - to directly measure change in indicated surplus levels

Comparison of Indicated Premiums: No Reinstatement vs. 1@100%

 

Previous