Sitemap Contact
   
 
 
How DFA Can Help the Property/Casualty Industry, Part 4
Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma...
Catastrophes: Models and Reserving
Risk Measures
Reinsurer Results:
Catastrophe and Strengthening
Hurricanes: 2003 and 2004 Results, Clustering and TransitioninG
Brushfire and Fire Following Exposures
Tsunami Exposure Worldwide and U.S.
Wind and Hail: Relative Hazard Levels
Cat Modeling Class
Our Capabilitites
Property Coverage Parts for Catastrophe Modeling
Introduction to Reinsurance
Holborn Technical Seminar
Catastrophe, Injury, and Insurance
Review of Myers & Read ARIA Paper
A Perfectly Ordinary Tuesday Morning
This is Not Your Father’s Cat Model
Global Warming and Increased Catastrophes?
Reinsurer Risk Loads from Marginal Surplus Requirements, PCAS LXXVII
Reinsurance Markets
Risk Transfer Assessment
Introduction to Asset Returns and Risks
CAS Call Paper Panel
Ceded Reinsurance Issues in DFA
Catastrophe Reinsurance Simulation Game
Reinsurance by any other name
Clash Pricing
ALLOCATION OF SURPLUS FOR A MULTI-LINE INSURER
Optimization to Improve Business Performance

 

 
February 8, 2005
Paul Kneuer
 
Page: 1 2 3 4

Primary and Secondary Uncertainty

Primary Uncertainty asks the question of “will a particular scenario happen?” It is expressed in the event loss table exceedance rates. 3% chance of an event happening 97% chance it doesn’t.

Secondary Uncertainty asks the question of “When a scenario happens, what is the range of specific results?” This is reflected in event-by-event confidence ranges. Is a 7.2 on the Hayward fault in downtown San Jose a $10Bn. event or a $25Bn. event?

Total Uncertainty is a blend of both primary and secondary uncertainty, reflecting that some items diversify across possible scenarios (what is the level of tide at landfall?) and some do not (are building codes really enforced?).

Non-Diversifiable Uncertainty

Common Sources of Model Uncertainty

Event size, location and timing

Actual structural vulnerability

Varying construction codes

Changes in force levels as events progress

Local surface variations and measurement uncertainty

Missiles damage (related to soil condition, foliage, prior damage)

Missing or Non-Modeled exposure

LAE Power Outages
Demand Surge Incomplete Data (e.g., Autos, Scheduled risks)
Flood Incorrect Valuations (e.g., ITV)
Tornadoes    

Missile Damage

 

Models Are Very Good at Considering:

Coverages A and B

Experimental data from wind tunnel/shake table tests

Number of major historical events for large geographic regions (e.g. a state or fault)

Reconciliation to industry data, such as PCS or Sigma

25-year to 75-year return times

Structure Loss vs. Construction Data


Two Houses, Two Fates
Two houses on Belmont Street in the Old Est Hills Historic District of Pensacola had distinctly different fates when Ivan hit. The house on the right was built in 1903 and refurbished. The house on the left was built by Habitat for Humanity and is only a few years old.

Although Less Data is Available, Modelers Use Reasonable Formulas
to Handle Other Characteristics:

Coverage C and Automobiles, WC and Life

Insurance-to-Value factors

Deductibles

Inuring Coverages

Construction and Occupancy

Demand Surge

Peak gusts and multiple shake frequencies

The stringency of building codes, by year built and jurisdiction

Long-term changes in the patterns of reporting data observations

Finer scale (county, town) topography

Fire following, terrorism

Automobile Loss Hazard


Cool Truck
A truck ended up in the swimming pool in back of a home in Pensacola’s Grande Lagoon area, where Ivan’s powerful winds and storm surge took their greatest toll.

Peak Gust Variation


Twister
A Waterspout forms off of Fort Myers on Aug. 12, the day before Hurricane Charley struck Florida’s west coast.

More Subtle Factors that the Models Can Only Implicitly Reflect:

Coverage D and Risk Excess layers

Secondary uncertainty/ Correlation issues

The degree of enforcement of local building codes

Foliage

Weather patterns before and after loss events

Physical alignment of structures along events’ force vectors

Local variations of concentrations or hazard (street address detail)

Changes in claims handling and other industry practices

Also:

Data for medium-sized events, 0-10 year return time losses, are not collected as consistently as for larger events. Modelers must look to larger events and back into these events

Data for mega-events, 250+ year return time losses, are also missing due to limited history. Modelers must extrapolate loss potentials from smaller events

Demand Surge (for blue tarps)

“So, Why Do We Use Models At All?”

Models provide highly-educated guesses.

  • Reduce the parameters of the unknown.

  • Model differences are unsettling, but help calibrate the degree of uncertainty.

  • A starting point, but certainly not an ending point

Models leverage a ton of (continually-evolving) scientific research and engineering work.

Models enable a more consistent and dynamic approach to underwriting and risk-management.

Outside stakeholders require it as a means of justification.

  • Rating agencies

  • Regulators

  • Reinsurers

  • Analysts

Parameters of the Unknown


Wooded Lot
This two-by-four plank was apparently driven by Hurricane Jeanne’s 100-mph winds
into the blacktop of the parking lost at Avalon State Park on North Hutchinson Island

Previous Next